Do you end up designing screens with solely a imprecise thought of how the issues on the display relate to the issues elsewhere within the system? Do you allow stakeholder conferences with unclear directives that always appear to contradict earlier conversations? You know a greater understanding of person wants would assist the crew get clear on what you might be truly making an attempt to perform, however time and price range for analysis is tight. With regards to asking for extra direct contact together with your customers, you may really feel like poor Oliver Twist, timidly asking, “Please, sir, I would like some extra.”
Article Continues Under
Right here’s the trick. You’ll want to get stakeholders themselves to determine high-risk assumptions and hidden complexity, in order that they develop into simply as motivated as you to get solutions from customers. Mainly, it’s worthwhile to make them suppose it’s their thought.
On this article, I’ll present you easy methods to collaboratively expose misalignment and gaps within the crew’s shared understanding by bringing the crew collectively round two easy questions:
- What are the objects?
- What are the relationships between these objects?
A gauntlet between analysis and display design#section2
These two questions align to the primary two steps of the ORCA course of, which could develop into your new greatest good friend in relation to lowering guesswork. Wait, what’s ORCA?! Glad you requested.
ORCA stands for Objects, Relationships, CTAs, and Attributes, and it outlines a course of for creating strong object-oriented person experiences. Object-oriented UX is my design philosophy. ORCA is an iterative methodology for synthesizing person analysis into a sublime structural basis to help display and interplay design. OOUX and ORCA have made my work as a UX designer extra collaborative, efficient, environment friendly, enjoyable, strategic, and significant.
The ORCA course of has 4 iterative rounds and a whopping fifteen steps. In every spherical we get extra readability on our Os, Rs, Cs, and As.

I generally say that ORCA is a “rubbish in, rubbish out” course of. To make sure that the testable prototype produced within the remaining spherical truly assessments effectively, the method must be fed by good analysis. However should you don’t have a ton of analysis, the start of the ORCA course of serves one other function: it helps you promote the want for analysis.

In different phrases, the ORCA course of serves as a gauntlet between analysis and design. With good analysis, you possibly can gracefully journey the killer whale from analysis into design. However with out good analysis, the method successfully spits you again into analysis and with a cache of particular open questions.
Getting in the identical curiosity-boat#section3
What will get us into hassle will not be what we don’t know. It’s what we all know for certain that simply ain’t so.
Mark Twain
The primary two steps of the ORCA course of—Object Discovery and Relationship Discovery—shine a highlight on the darkish, dusty corners of your crew’s misalignments and any inherent complexity that’s been swept underneath the rug. It begins to reveal what this traditional comedian so fantastically illustrates:

That is one purpose why so many UX designers are pissed off of their job and why many initiatives fail. And that is additionally why we frequently can’t promote analysis: each decision-maker is assured in their very own psychological image.
As soon as we expose hidden fuzzy patches in every image and the variations between all of them, the case for person analysis makes itself.
However how we do that is vital. Nonetheless a lot we would need to, we are able to’t simply inform everybody, “YOU ARE WRONG!” As an alternative, we have to facilitate and information our crew members to self-identify holes of their image. When stakeholders take possession of assumptions and gaps in understanding, BAM! Out of the blue, UX analysis will not be such a tough promote, and everyone seems to be aboard the identical curiosity-boat.
Say your customers are docs. And you haven’t any thought how docs use the system you might be tasked with redesigning.
You may attempt to promote analysis by truthfully saying: “We have to perceive docs higher! What are their ache factors? How do they use the present app?” However right here’s the issue with that. These questions are imprecise, and the solutions to them don’t really feel acutely actionable.
As an alternative, you need your stakeholders themselves to ask super-specific questions. That is extra just like the form of dialog it’s worthwhile to facilitate. Let’s pay attention in:
“Wait a sec, how usually do docs share sufferers? Does a affected person on this system have main and secondary docs?”
“Can a affected person even have a couple of main physician?”
“Is it a ‘main physician’ or only a ‘main caregiver’… Can’t that function be a nurse practitioner?”
“No, caregivers are one thing else… That’s the affected person’s household contacts, proper?”
“So are caregivers in scope for this redesign?”
“Yeah, as a result of if a caregiver is current at an appointment, the physician wants to notice that. Like, tag the caregiver on the observe… Or on the appointment?”
Now we’re getting someplace. Do you see how highly effective it may be getting stakeholders to debate these questions themselves? The diabolical aim right here is to shake their confidence—gently and diplomatically.
When these sorts of questions bubble up collaboratively and are available immediately from the mouths of your stakeholders and decision-makers, all of the sudden, designing screens with out understanding the solutions to those questions appears extremely dangerous, even foolish.
If we create software program with out understanding the real-world data atmosphere of our customers, we are going to seemingly create software program that doesn’t align to the real-world data atmosphere of our customers. And this can, palms down, lead to a extra complicated, extra advanced, and fewer intuitive software program product.
However how can we get to those sorts of meaty questions diplomatically, effectively, collaboratively, and reliably?
We are able to do that by beginning with these two massive questions that align to the primary two steps of the ORCA course of:
- What are the objects?
- What are the relationships between these objects?
In apply, getting to those solutions is less complicated stated than carried out. I’m going to point out you the way these two easy questions can present the define for an Object Definition Workshop. Throughout this workshop, these “seed” questions will blossom into dozens of particular questions and shine a highlight on the necessity for extra person analysis.
Prep work: Noun foraging#section5
Within the subsequent part, I’ll present you easy methods to run an Object Definition Workshop together with your stakeholders (and whole cross-functional crew, hopefully). However first, it’s worthwhile to do some prep work.
Mainly, search for nouns which might be specific to the enterprise or business of your challenge, and do it throughout not less than a couple of sources. I name this noun foraging.
Listed below are only a few nice noun foraging sources:
- the product’s advertising and marketing website
- the product’s opponents’ advertising and marketing websites (aggressive evaluation, anybody?)
- the present product (have a look at labels!)
- person interview transcripts
- notes from stakeholder interviews or imaginative and prescient docs from stakeholders
Put your detective hat on, my pricey Watson. Get resourceful and leverage what you’ve gotten. If all you’ve gotten is a advertising and marketing web site, some screenshots of the present legacy system, and entry to customer support chat logs, then use these.
As you peruse these sources, look ahead to the nouns which might be used time and again, and begin itemizing them (ideally on blue sticky notes should you’ll be creating an object map later!).
You’ll need to concentrate on nouns that may signify objects in your system. In case you are having hassle figuring out if a noun could be object-worthy, bear in mind the acronym SIP and check for:
- Construction
- Situations
- Function
Consider a library app, for instance. Is “ebook” an object?
Construction: are you able to suppose of some attributes for this potential object? Title, creator, publish date… Yep, it has construction. Examine!
Occasion: what are some examples of this potential “ebook” object? Are you able to title a couple of? The Alchemist, Prepared Participant One, All people Poops… OK, test!
Function: why is that this object vital to the customers and enterprise? Effectively, “ebook” is what our library shopper is offering to individuals and books are why individuals come to the library… Examine, test, test!

As you might be noun foraging, concentrate on capturing the nouns which have SIP. Keep away from capturing parts like dropdowns, checkboxes, and calendar pickers—your UX system will not be your design system! Parts are simply the packaging for objects—they’re a method to an finish. Nobody is coming to your digital place to play together with your dropdown! They’re coming for the VALUABLE THINGS and what they will do with them. These issues, or objects, are what we are attempting to determine.
Let’s say we work for a startup disrupting the e-mail expertise. That is how I’d begin my noun foraging.
First I’d have a look at my very own electronic mail shopper, which occurs to be Gmail. I’d then have a look at Outlook and the brand new HEY electronic mail. I’d have a look at Yahoo, Hotmail…I’d even have a look at Slack and Basecamp and different so-called “electronic mail replacers.” I’d learn some articles, critiques, and discussion board threads the place persons are complaining about electronic mail. Whereas doing all this, I might search for and write down the nouns.
(Earlier than shifting on, be happy to go noun foraging for this hypothetical product, too, after which scroll all the way down to see how a lot our lists match up. Simply don’t get misplaced in your personal emails! Come again to me!)
Drumroll, please…
Listed below are a couple of nouns I got here up with throughout my noun foraging:
- electronic mail message
- thread
- contact
- shopper
- rule/automation
- electronic mail deal with that’s not a contact?
- contact teams
- attachment
- Google doc file / different built-in file
- e-newsletter? (HEY treats this in a different way)
- saved responses and templates

Scan your checklist of nouns and pick phrases that you’re fully clueless about. In our electronic mail instance, it could be shopper or automation. Do as a lot homework as you possibly can earlier than your session with stakeholders: google what’s googleable. However different phrases could be so particular to the product or area that it’s worthwhile to have a dialog about them.
Apart: listed here are some actual nouns foraged throughout my very own previous challenge work that I wanted my stakeholders to assist me perceive:
- File Locator
- Incentive Residence
- Augmented Line Merchandise
- Curriculum-Based mostly Measurement Probe
That is actually all it’s worthwhile to put together for the workshop session: a listing of nouns that signify potential objects and a brief checklist of nouns that must be outlined additional.
Facilitate an Object Definition Workshop#section6
You would truly begin your workshop with noun foraging—this exercise can be carried out collaboratively. When you’ve got 5 individuals within the room, decide 5 sources, assign one to each individual, and provides everybody ten minutes to seek out the objects inside their supply. When the time’s up, come collectively and discover the overlap. Affinity mapping is your good friend right here!
In case your crew is brief on time and could be reluctant to do this type of grunt work (which is normally the case) do your personal noun foraging beforehand, however be ready to point out your work. I really like presenting screenshots of paperwork and screens with all of the nouns already highlighted. Convey the artifacts of your course of, and begin the workshop with a five-minute overview of your noun foraging journey.
HOT TIP: earlier than leaping into the workshop, body the dialog as a requirements-gathering session to assist you higher perceive the scope and particulars of the system. You don’t must allow them to know that you simply’re in search of gaps within the crew’s understanding to be able to show the necessity for extra person analysis—that can be our little secret. As an alternative, go into the session optimistically, as in case your educated stakeholders and PMs and biz of us have already got all of the solutions.
Then, let the query whack-a-mole begin.
1. What is that this factor?#section7
Need to have some actual enjoyable? In the beginning of your session, ask stakeholders to privately write definitions for the handful of obscure nouns you could be unsure about. Then, have everybody present their playing cards on the similar time and see should you get totally different definitions (you’ll). That is gold for exposing misalignment and beginning nice conversations.
As your dialogue unfolds, seize any agreed-upon definitions. And when uncertainty emerges, quietly (however visibly) begin an “open questions” parking zone. 😉
After definitions solidify, right here’s an amazing follow-up:
2. Do our customers know what this stuff are? What do customers name this factor?#section8
Stakeholder 1: They in all probability name electronic mail purchasers “apps.” However I’m unsure.
Stakeholder 2: Automations are sometimes referred to as “workflows,” I feel. Or, perhaps customers suppose workflows are one thing totally different.
If a extra user-friendly time period emerges, ask the group if they will agree to make use of solely that time period shifting ahead. This fashion, the crew can higher align to the customers’ language and mindset.
OK, shifting on.
When you’ve got two or extra objects that appear to overlap in function, ask certainly one of these questions:
3. Are these the identical factor? Or are these totally different? If they don’t seem to be the identical, how are they totally different?#section9
You: Is a saved response the identical as a template?
Stakeholder 1: Sure! Positively.
Stakeholder 2: I don’t suppose so… A saved response is textual content with hyperlinks and variables, however a template is extra about the feel and appear, like default fonts, colours, and placeholder photographs.
Proceed to construct out your rising glossary of objects. And proceed to seize areas of uncertainty in your “open questions” parking zone.
If you happen to efficiently decide that two related issues are, in reality, totally different, right here’s your subsequent follow-up query:
4. What’s the connection between these objects?#section10
You: Are saved responses and templates associated in any method?
Stakeholder 3: Yeah, a template will be utilized to a saved response.
You, all the time with the follow-ups: When is the template utilized to a saved response? Does that occur when the person is setting up the saved response? Or after they apply the saved response to an electronic mail? How does that truly work?
Hear. Seize uncertainty. As soon as the checklist of “open questions” grows to a important mass, pause to start out assigning inquiries to teams or people. Some questions could be for the dev crew (hopefully not less than one developer is within the room with you). One query could be particularly for somebody who couldn’t make it to the workshop. And lots of questions will must be labeled “person.”
Do you see how we’re constructing as much as our UXR gross sales pitch?
5. Is that this object in scope?#section11
Your subsequent query narrows the crew’s focus towards what’s most vital to your customers. You may merely ask, “Are saved responses in scope for our first launch?,” however I’ve received a greater, extra devious technique.
By now, it’s best to have a listing of clearly outlined objects. Ask members to type these objects from most to least vital, both in small breakout teams or individually. Then, such as you did with the definitions, have everybody reveal their type order directly. Surprisingly—or not so surprisingly—it’s commonplace for the VP to rank one thing like “saved responses” as #2 whereas everybody else places it on the backside of the checklist. Attempt to not look too smug as you inevitably expose extra misalignment.
I did this for a startup a couple of years in the past. We posted the three teams’ wildly totally different type orders on the whiteboard.

The CEO stood again, checked out it, and stated, “That is why we haven’t been capable of transfer ahead in two years.”
Admittedly, it’s tragic to listen to that, however as an expert, it feels fairly superior to be the one who facilitated a watershed realization.
Upon getting a good suggestion of in-scope, clearly outlined issues, that is whenever you transfer on to doing extra relationship mapping.
6. Create a visible illustration of the objects’ relationships#section12
We’ve already carried out a little bit of this whereas making an attempt to find out if two issues are totally different, however this time, ask the crew about each potential relationship. For every object, ask the way it pertains to all the opposite objects. In what methods are the objects linked? To visualise all of the connections, pull out your trusty boxes-and-arrows method. Right here, we’re connecting our objects with verbs. I prefer to maintain my verbs to easy “has a” and “has many” statements.

This technique modeling exercise brings up all kinds of recent questions:
- Can a saved response have attachments?
- Can a saved response use a template? In that case, if an electronic mail makes use of a saved response with a template, can the person override that template?
- Do customers need to see all of the emails they despatched that included a selected attachment? For instance, “present me all of the emails I despatched with ProfessionalImage.jpg connected. I’ve modified my skilled photograph and I need to alert everybody to replace it.”
Strong solutions may emerge immediately from the workshop members. Nice! Seize that new shared understanding. However when uncertainty surfaces, proceed so as to add inquiries to your rising parking zone.
You’ve positioned the explosives all alongside the floodgates. Now you merely need to gentle the fuse and BOOM. Watch the buy-in for person analysis flooooow.
Earlier than your workshop wraps up, have the group mirror on the checklist of open questions. Make plans for getting solutions internally, then concentrate on the questions that must be introduced earlier than customers.
Right here’s your remaining step. Take these questions you’ve compiled for person analysis and focus on the extent of threat related to NOT answering them. Ask, “if we design with out a solution to this query, if we make up our personal reply and we’re improper, how dangerous may that end up?”
With this technique, we’re cornering our decision-makers into advocating for person analysis as they themselves label questions as high-risk. Sorry, not sorry.
Now is your second of fact. With everybody within the room, ask for an inexpensive price range of money and time to conduct 6–8 person interviews centered particularly on these questions.
HOT TIP: if you’re new to UX analysis, please observe that you simply’ll seemingly must rephrase the questions that got here up through the workshop earlier than you current them to customers. Ensure your questions are open-ended and don’t lead the person into any default solutions.
Closing phrases: Maintain the display design!#section14
Significantly, if in any respect potential, don’t ever design screens once more with out first answering these elementary questions: what are the objects and the way do they relate?
I promise you this: should you can safe a shared understanding between the enterprise, design, and growth groups earlier than you begin designing screens, you’ll have much less heartache and save extra money and time, and (it virtually appears like a bonus at this level!) customers can be extra receptive to what you place out into the world.
I sincerely hope this helps you win time and price range to go speak to your customers and acquire readability on what you might be designing earlier than you begin constructing screens. If you happen to discover success utilizing noun foraging and the Object Definition Workshop, there’s extra the place that got here from in the remainder of the ORCA course of, which can assist forestall much more late-in-the-game scope tugs-of-war and technique pivots.
All the very best of luck! Now go promote analysis!